Disclosure: Some links in this article are affiliate links. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Few product names in the drawing-tablet market cause as many wrong purchases as "Wacom One." The phrase resolves to at least three different products: the 13.3-inch Wacom One pen display, model DTC133, which this guide covers; the 2023 Wacom One family, which includes the Wacom One 12 (DTC121), the Wacom One 13 touch (DTH134) and screenless Wacom One S/M tablets; and the separate One by Wacom line (CTL-472 and CTL-672), which has no screen at all. "Wacom One" usually means the display and "One by Wacom" the screenless tablets. This guide covers the display, and it answers a practical question: does a first-generation entry pen display still make sense as a purchase when its own successors and better-equipped rivals occupy the same shelf?
The DTC133 was announced at CES on January 7, 2020, as Wacom's most affordable pen display up to that point. It is a 13.3-inch 1080p panel with a battery-free EMR pen, no touch input, no shortcut keys, and a proprietary X-shaped cable that carries HDMI, USB data and power into the tablet through one connector. Wacom's current comparison material files it as "Gen. 1," and the display that succeeds it in the lineup, the Wacom One 14 (DTC141), was announced in September 2025.
What actually decides whether a DTC133 works for you is not the spec sheet headline. It is the surface construction and the pen-to-cursor gap, the difference between a black screen caused by the cable and one caused by the driver, how 4,096 pressure levels feel at the start of a stroke, and whether the panel's 72% NTSC color and 200 cd/m² brightness hold up against a 99% sRGB anti-glare glass display costing roughly the same. This guide works through each of those, then puts the DTC133 against the Wacom One 12, the Wacom One 13 touch, the Wacom One 14, and the Huion and XP-Pen displays that now ship laminated screens and hardware controls in the same bracket.
It is written for three readers: the buyer who has found a legacy DTC133 still listed and wants to know if it is worth taking, the beginner who wants a screen without paying current-generation prices, and anyone who typed "wacom tablet one" and needs to know which of these products that name can mean before they order.
| Specification | Wacom One (DTC133) |
|---|---|
| Type | Pen display; requires a host computer or supported Android device |
| Announced | January 7, 2020 (CES) |
| Display | 13.3-inch AHVA LCD, 1920 × 1080, 16:9 |
| Active area | ~294 × 166 mm |
| Color | 8-bit, ~72% NTSC |
| Brightness / contrast | 200 cd/m² / 1000:1 |
| Viewing angle | 170° |
| LCD response | 26 ms (pixel response time, not pen latency) |
| Surface | Anti-glare film |
| Dimensions / weight | ~357 × 225 × 14.6 mm / ~1.0 kg |
| Stand | Integrated fold-out legs, ~19° |
| Touch / shortcut keys | None |
| Pen | Wacom One Pen CP91300B2Z, EMR, battery-free |
| Pressure / tilt / resolution | 4,096 levels / ±60° / 2,540 lpi |
| Pen side switch | One programmable button |
| Connection | Proprietary X-cable (HDMI + USB-A + power) |
| OS support | Windows, macOS, ChromeOS, Android on compatible devices; no official iOS/iPadOS |
| Driver status | Listed as supported in Wacom's 6.4.14-1 macOS driver release |
Quick verdict: the DTC133 is a driver-supported entry pen display with a battery-free EMR pen and a visibly dated panel. The pen behavior is the reason to consider it; 72% NTSC color, 200 cd/m² brightness, an anti-glare film surface and the X-cable are the reasons to hesitate. It is worth buying only when its price sits clearly below what a Wacom One 14 or a laminated Huion or XP-Pen display costs, and only if your computer can feed it HDMI, USB-A and power.
Which "Wacom One" Are You Actually Buying?
| Name on the box | Model | What it is | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wacom One (Gen. 1) | DTC133 | 13.3-inch pen display, film surface | Legacy, still driver-supported |
| Wacom One 12 | DTC121 | 11.6-inch pen display, anti-glare glass | Current drivers, superseded as the headline display |
| Wacom One 13 touch | DTH134 | 13.3-inch pen display with 10-finger multitouch | Current drivers. Note: DTC131 is an incorrect identifier for this model |
| Wacom One 14 | DTC141 | 14-inch direct-bonded pen display | Current generation |
| One by Wacom Small / Medium | CTL-472 / CTL-672 | Screenless pen tablets | Current |
| One by Wacom (previous gen) | CTL-471 / CTL-671 | Screenless pen tablets | Dropped from current drivers |
| Wacom One S / M | CTC4110WL / CTC6110WL | Screenless tablets sold under the "Wacom One" name since 2023 | Current |
The shorthand that served buyers for years, "Wacom One means a screen, One by Wacom means no screen", held until August 2023, when Wacom expanded the Wacom One name to cover both displays and screenless tablets. The company's own driver lists "Wacom One," "Wacom One S/M" and "One by Wacom" side by side, so the rule is now a strong hint rather than a guarantee. The reliable check is the model code: DTC and DTH prefixes are pen displays, CTL and CTC prefixes are screenless tablets. Wacom's current driver compatibility list even carries an entry for a DTH142 "Wacom One 14 touch" with no matching retail page or public product announcement, a sign that the family will keep growing.
If your search results mixed these products together, that is the reason. A beginner who orders a CTL-672 expecting a screen, or a buyer who assumes every "Wacom One" listing is the 13.3-inch display, has made the same mistake in opposite directions.
Wacom One DTC133 Overview
On paper the DTC133 is plainly a first-generation budget display: a 1.0 kg slab roughly 14.6 mm thick, with fold-out legs that lock at about 19° and a matte film surface. There is no touch layer to smudge and no ExpressKeys strip along the bezel, which means every command (brush size, zoom, undo) goes back to the keyboard. For artists who already work with one hand on the keyboard, that is neutral. For anyone coming from an iPad or from a display with a shortcut dial, it is a noticeable step back in workflow.
The single cable is the other defining trait. Power, USB data and HDMI all enter through Wacom's X-shaped connector, which is tidy on a desk where a single run back to the tower is possible, and awkward on a laptop that only has USB-C ports. Nothing about the DTC133 can be reduced to a USB-C-to-USB-C connection; that architecture arrives with the 2023 Wacom One displays, not here.
The drawing surface is the hardware's stronger side. The film surface is textured to give the pen some friction, and the 13.3-inch active area, about 294 × 166 mm, is large enough for full-figure sketching and for panel work in Clip Studio Paint without constant canvas panning.
Specs & What's in the Box
The retail box contains the DTC133 display, the Wacom One Pen CP91300B2Z, the X-shaped cable, an AC adapter, replacement nibs, and quick-start plus regulatory documentation. There is no stand beyond the integrated legs, no drawing glove, no alternative nib types, and no shortcut remote.
Two specs on that list deserve more weight than they usually get. First, the resolution: 1920 × 1080 across a 13.3-inch panel yields a pixel density that is comfortable for line work and does not force you to zoom in to see aliasing on thin strokes. Second, the pressure figure: 4,096 levels, matched to ±60° tilt and 2,540 lpi pen resolution. The tilt range matters more than the raw pressure number for shading with a broad, angled brush.
The pen uses Wacom EMR, which is why it has no battery, no charging routine and no pairing step: it draws its power from the tablet's electromagnetic field. It carries one programmable side switch, and the nibs are replaceable. If the original CP91300B2Z is lost, Wacom officially lists the current Wacom One Standard Pen CP92303B2Z as compatible with the DTC133, which makes it the cleaner replacement route than chasing the older SKU.
Build Quality, Surface & the Parallax Question
The chassis is plastic and weighs about 1.0 kg. The fold-out legs hold a fixed angle of roughly 19°, which is usable for sketching and too shallow for long sessions of detailed work. Because Wacom's current official stands are specified for the 2023 and 2025 displays rather than this one, there is no first-party accessory to raise it.
The surface is where the generation gap shows most clearly. The DTC133 uses an anti-glare film; the Wacom One 12, 13 touch and 14 use anti-glare glass. Film is the older construction, and it wears under sustained pen contact in a way glass does not, which is the practical argument for replacing nibs rather than adding a protector.
Parallax is the specification Wacom never published a number for. What the spec sheet does show is the construction: film surface, no direct bonding. Direct bonding is exactly what the Wacom One 14 introduces, and it exists to reduce the visible separation between pen tip and image. Without direct bonding, expect a visible gap between pen tip and image at shallow viewing angles, and it is the single aspect that a spec sheet will never fully convey. If you can see one in person before buying, that is the thing to look at.
Performance: Pen Feel, Color, and Driver Support
The pen is the strongest part of this product. The EMR digitizer covers the full 294 × 166 mm active area, the ±60° tilt supports angled shading, and the absence of a battery removes an entire category of failure.
The panel is the weakest part, and the numbers say so without hedging. 8-bit color at approximately 72% NTSC is enough for line art, inking, layout and value studies. It is not a display to trust for print-critical color matching, and it will look muted next to a 99% sRGB panel. At 200 cd/m² it is also dim: the Wacom One 12 reaches 275 cd/m² and the Wacom One 13 touch reaches 320 cd/m², with contrast of 1400:1 and 2000:1 respectively against the DTC133's 1000:1. A 170° viewing angle keeps the image stable when you work slightly off-axis, which matters on a display that sits at a fixed 19°.
On response, Wacom publishes 26 ms for the DTC133, and it is worth being precise about what that measures. It is LCD pixel response time, the speed at which a pixel changes state, not pen-to-cursor latency. Wacom does not publish a pen latency figure in milliseconds for this model, and treating the 26 ms number as input lag would be a misreading.
Driver support is where the DTC133 defies its age. Wacom's 6.4.14-1 macOS driver release, dated August 26, 2026, still lists the DTC133 as supported, six years after launch. That release also fixes a problem where four-point pen calibration settings on pen displays were reset after a restart. The known issues in the same release notes apply to all models: Wacom Center may not detect a device that is unplugged and replugged after macOS sleeps, and Force Proportions does not work as expected with the Display Toggle feature on pen tablets. On macOS, installation requires Privacy & Security permissions, and there is a known reconnect-after-sleep issue when Wacom Center stays open; restarting the driver is Wacom's own workaround.
One expectation to set correctly: pressure-level marketing has run away from reality. Competing displays now advertise 8K or 16K levels while the Wacom One displays sit at 4,096. What changes the feel of a stroke is the pressure curve at the very start of contact, not the resolution of the scale. For any of these pens, check how light strokes respond at the start of contact before committing, and use the pressure curve settings in Wacom Center to tune it.
Black Screen? Separate the Cable Fault from the Driver Fault
A frequent setup failure with the DTC133 is a display that shows nothing while pen input appears to be detected. That symptom has two distinct causes, and confusing them wastes an afternoon.
The first is the cable topology. The DTC133 needs both USB data and a valid HDMI video signal travelling through its X-cable at the same time. On a desktop tower, the classic mistake is plugging the HDMI leg into the motherboard's video output rather than the discrete GPU's output: the tablet powers up, the pen is detected, and no image arrives. The X-cable is proprietary, so a USB-C-to-USB-C cable cannot stand in for it, unlike the Wacom One 12 and 13 touch, which accept USB-C with DisplayPort Alt Mode and sufficient power, or fall back to Wacom's 3-in-1 HDMI/USB cable.
The second cause is software. Wacom's release notes document driver-side issues that affect pen displays in general, including four-point calibration settings being reset after a restart (fixed in 6.4.14-1). A DTC133 whose cursor drifts or whose strokes behave unevenly is therefore more likely to be a driver state problem (permissions on macOS, a stale install, a sleeping device not re-detected) than failing hardware. Restarting the driver addresses the macOS reconnect case specifically.
Two compatibility limits are worth stating plainly. There is no official iOS or iPadOS support for the DTC133, so an iPad cannot drive it as a normal pen display. Android support exists on compatible devices, and the DTC133 is ChromeOS-compatible but not WWCB-certified, which is a narrower promise than "works with anything."
Wacom One DTC133 vs Wacom One 14 DTC141: Head-to-Head
| Specification | Wacom One (DTC133) | Wacom One 12 (DTC121) | Wacom One 13 touch (DTH134) | Wacom One 14 (DTC141) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2020 | August 2023 | August 2023 | September 2025 |
| Size | 13.3-inch AHVA | 11.6-inch IPS | 13.3-inch IPS | 14.0-inch IPS |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Active area | ~294 × 166 mm | ~257 × 145 mm | ~294 × 165 mm | ~309 × 174 mm |
| Color | ~72% NTSC | ~99% sRGB | ~99% sRGB | ~98% sRGB |
| Brightness / contrast | 200 cd/m² / 1000:1 | 275 cd/m² / 1400:1 | 320 cd/m² / 2000:1 | 285 cd/m² / 1000:1 |
| Viewing angle | 170° | 170° | 170° | 178° |
| LCD response | 26 ms | 18 ms | 19 ms | 16 ms |
| Surface | Anti-glare film | Anti-glare glass | Anti-glare glass | Anti-glare + anti-fingerprint glass |
| Bonding | Not bonded | Not bonded | Not bonded | Direct-bonded |
| Touch | No | No | 10-finger multitouch | No |
| Connection | X-cable (HDMI + USB-A + power) | USB-C DP Alt Mode + power, or 3-in-1 cable | USB-C DP Alt Mode + power, or 3-in-1 cable | USB-C DP Alt Mode / Thunderbolt |
| Android support | Yes, on compatible devices | Yes, selected devices | Yes, selected devices | Not listed |
| Stand included | Fold-out legs, ~19° | No | No | No |
Against the Wacom One 14, the DTC133 loses on nearly every panel metric that matters: 72% NTSC against 98% sRGB, 200 cd/m² against 285, a film surface against anti-glare and anti-fingerprint glass, no bonding against direct-bonded construction, 14.6 mm and 1.0 kg against 10 mm and 750 g. The Wacom One 14 also carries the same 4,096 pressure levels, the same ±60° tilt, the same 2,540 lpi and the same EMR pen standard, so the pen experience is not where the gap opens. It opens on the glass.
Two counterweights keep this from being a walkover. The Wacom One 14 drops Android from its listed requirements, while the DTC133 still supports it. And the Wacom One 14 requires a USB-C host that can actually carry video and data with sufficient power, a port that many desktops and older laptops do not have. The DTC133 asks for HDMI, USB-A and a wall outlet, which is an older combination but a more predictable one. Neither device includes a stand: the DTC133 has its fold-out legs, the Wacom One 14 has nothing, since a Wacom stand is sold separately.
Within the family, the Wacom One 12 is not a size-for-size rival: at 11.6 inches and 0.7 kg it is the portable pick, with anti-glare glass and 99% sRGB, and it keeps Android support and the 3-in-1 cable fallback. The Wacom One 13 touch is the model to choose if you want a 13.3-inch panel with 10-finger multitouch, 320 cd/m² and 2000:1 contrast, with the caveat that macOS 14 has a documented issue where some four-finger Mission Control gestures fail on touch-equipped Wacom devices.
Where the DTC133 Stands Against Huion and XP-Pen
The competitive picture has moved further than the Wacom One family has. Huion's Kamvas 13 Gen 3 pairs a roughly 13.3-inch laminated full-HD panel with PenTech 4, shortcut controls and one-cable capability. XP-Pen's Artist 12 3rd puts a laminated 11.9-inch display, an X4 EMR pen rated at 16,384 pressure levels, eight shortcut keys and a dial on the desk, with a stand and a drawing glove included in the box. The XP-Pen Artist 13.3 Pro V2 matches the DTC133's 13.3-inch footprint with a laminated panel, hardware controls and the same bundled stand-and-glove arrangement. UGEE's UE12 and UE12 Plus follow the same recipe at the bottom of the bracket: laminated 12-inch-class displays with shortcut hardware.
Set against those, the DTC133 offers no shortcut keys, no touch, no lamination, a film surface, 72% NTSC color and a proprietary cable, and its rivals ship stands and gloves that Wacom sells separately. The counterargument for Wacom is not spec-sheet bravado. It is that a six-year-old display still receives current drivers, that EMR pen behavior is predictable enough to build muscle memory on, that the nib and accessory ecosystem is documented and stocked, and that Wacom's step-up path, up to Movink 13 and Cintiq 16, uses the same pen assumptions. Xencelabs does not compete here at all: its screenless tablets sit against One by Wacom and Intuos, and the Pen Display 16 is a different price category entirely.
The honest framing is a trade, not a winner. If maximum hardware per dollar drives the decision (laminated glass, shortcut controls, bundled stand), the Huion and XP-Pen displays deliver more of it. If you want Wacom's pen feel and a support life measured in years rather than product cycles, the DTC133's price has to compensate for the panel you are giving up.
Recommended Upgrades & Accessories
Replacement nibs. The original CP91300B2Z pen uses ACK24501Z standard nibs, the correct consumable for a worn tip on this display. For the current CP92303B2Z pen, the standard pack is ACK24911Z, with a felt option (ACK24919Z) and an elastomer option (ACK24918Z) that change the friction of the stroke without adding anything over the screen. Hard metal or titanium third-party nibs are the one accessory to avoid: on a textured drawing surface they trade nib wear for surface wear, and replacement plastic nibs cost little.
A replacement pen. If the original stylus is lost, the Wacom One Standard Pen CP92303B2Z is officially compatible with the DTC133 and is the current-generation part. The original CP91300B2Z remains available as replacement stock but is the older SKU.
Drawing glove. A drawing glove reduces skin drag on the surface. It does more for comfort than a screen protector does, and it adds no optical layer between you and the image.
Stand. There is no Wacom stand specified for the DTC133: the ACK649Z is built for the Wacom One 12 and 13 touch, and a separate stand for the Wacom One 14 and Movink. The DTC133's fixed 19° legs are what you get unless you bring your own support.
Screen protector, with a caveat. Wacom does not make a first-party protector for any Wacom One display. Third-party films exist but are model-specific, and the four "Wacom One" displays differ in both size and surface construction, so a film cut for one will not fit or behave the same on another. Adding a matte film to a display that already has an anti-glare layer changes clarity, texture and nib wear. Replace nibs first.
Who Should Buy the Wacom One DTC133?
Buy it if you have found the legacy unit at a price clearly below a current-generation display, you want Wacom EMR without a USB-C compatibility gamble, and you have a free HDMI output, a free USB-A port and a wall outlet at your desk. It also suits anyone whose work is line art, inking, layout or value studies where 72% NTSC color and 200 cd/m² brightness are sufficient.
Skip it if you want shortcut keys or a dial, a laminated display, touch input, or color accuracy for print work: every one of those is available in the same bracket from Huion, XP-Pen or UGEE. Skip it if you work from a laptop with only USB-C ports, because the X-cable needs HDMI and USB-A. Skip it if you want to draw on an iPad, since no official iOS support exists. And skip it if what you actually wanted was a screenless tablet: that is One by Wacom, a different product line wearing a confusingly similar name.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Is the Wacom One DTC133 still supported by Wacom?
Yes. Wacom's 6.4.14-1 macOS driver release lists the DTC133 among supported devices, and the same release fixes four-point pen calibration settings being reset after a restart on pen displays. That is unusually long support for a display in this price bracket.
Q: What is the difference between Wacom One and One by Wacom?
Wacom One is a pen display: it has a screen and connects to a computer. One by Wacom is a screenless pen tablet (models CTL-472 and CTL-672) where you draw on the tablet while watching your monitor. Since August 2023, Wacom has also sold screenless tablets under the "Wacom One" name (Wacom One S and M), so the safest check is the model code: DTC or DTH means a display, CTL or CTC means no screen.
Q: Can I connect the DTC133 with a single USB-C cable?
No. The DTC133 uses Wacom's proprietary X-shaped cable, which combines HDMI, USB-A data and power. Single-cable USB-C operation, where the host supports DisplayPort Alt Mode and enough power, arrived with the Wacom One 12 and 13 touch, and the Wacom One 14 requires a USB-C port capable of carrying both video and data.
Q: Should I buy the Wacom One 14 instead of the DTC133?
If staying inside Wacom's lineup and buying new, the Wacom One 14 is the better panel: direct-bonded 14-inch glass, 98% sRGB, 285 cd/m², 178° viewing angle, 750 g. It costs more, does not list Android support, ships without a stand, and needs a USB-C host that can genuinely output video. The DTC133 remains the option to consider when its price is materially lower and your ports are HDMI and USB-A.
Q: Does the Wacom One work with an iPad?
There is no official iOS or iPadOS support for the DTC133 or for the current Wacom One displays. Android support exists on compatible devices for the DTC133 and the 2023 models, and ChromeOS is supported with the caveat that the DTC133 is not WWCB-certified.
Q: Can I use the newer Wacom One Standard Pen on the DTC133?
Yes. Wacom officially lists the CP92303B2Z Wacom One Standard Pen as compatible with the DTC133, alongside the Wacom One 12, 13 touch and 14. It uses the same battery-free EMR technology, 4,096 pressure levels and ±60° tilt, and takes the current nib families — standard, felt and elastomer.
Conclusion & Final Verdict
The Wacom One DTC133 is a first-generation budget pen display that has aged unevenly. Its pen (battery-free EMR, 4,096 pressure levels, ±60° tilt, 2,540 lpi, across a 294 × 166 mm active area) is still the part of the experience that justifies the Wacom premium. Its panel is not: 72% NTSC color, 200 cd/m² brightness, a 1000:1 contrast ratio, an anti-glare film surface and no direct bonding put it visibly behind the Wacom One 12, 13 touch and 14, and behind laminated Huion and XP-Pen displays that add shortcut controls and bundle a stand. The proprietary X-cable, meanwhile, makes the DTC133 the only display in this family that cannot be driven over a single USB-C connection.
What keeps it in the conversation is support life. A display announced in January 2020 is still listed in Wacom's current driver releases, something no spec table communicates. That, plus the HDMI-plus-USB-A connection, makes it a predictable choice on older desktops and a poor one on USB-C-only laptops.
So the decision comes down to price against panel. If a legacy DTC133 is available clearly below what the Wacom One 14 or a laminated competitor costs, and you accept 1080p at 72% NTSC with no touch and no shortcut keys, it is a dependable entry into Wacom's pen ecosystem. Pay current-generation money for it and you are buying a 2020 panel at a 2020 disadvantage.
